Books+ Search Results
The U.S. Should Adopt the "Right to Be Forgotten" Online A Debate
Title
The U.S. Should Adopt the "Right to Be Forgotten" Online [electronic resource] : A Debate / Intelligence2.
Publication
[Place of publication not identified] : Intelligence2, [2015]
Distribution
New York, N.Y. : distributed by Infobase, 2015.
Copyright Notice Date
©2015
Physical Description
1 streaming video file (1 video file (1 hr. 31 min., 36 sec.)) : sound, color.
Local Notes
Access is available to the Yale community.
Notes
Streaming video file encoded with permission for digital streaming by Infobase on September 09, 2015.
Closed-captioned.
Title from distributor's description (Infobase, October 1 2015).
Access and use
Access restricted by licensing agreement.
Summary
In 2014, the European Union's Court of Justice ruled that individuals have a right to be forgotten online, "the right-under certain conditions-to ask search engines to remove links with personal information about them." This right is not absolute, however, but meant to be balanced against other fundamental rights, like freedom of expression. In the six months following the court's decision, Google received more than 180,000 removal requests. Of those reviewed and processed, 41% were granted. Largely seen as a victory by Europeans, the reaction among Americans was overwhelmingly negative. Was the Court of Justice's ruling a win for privacy and human dignity, or a blow to free speech and public information? Should the United States adopt the "right to be forgotten" online?
Variant and related titles
Right to Be Forgotten
Films on demand.
Other formats
digital transfer of (manifestation): Intelligence2, 2015.
Format
Images / Online / Video & Film
Language
English
Added to Catalog
May 20, 2019
System details note
System requirements: FOD playback platform.
Audience
9 & up.
Contents
Introduction: Right to Be Forgotten Online Debate (1:22)
Debate "Housekeeping" (4:22)
For the Motion: Paul Nemitz (7:28)
Against the Motion: Andrew McLaughlin (7:16)
For the Motion: Eric Posner (7:25)
Against the Motion: Jonathan Zittrain (7:04)
Encouraging Censorship? (7:44)
Internet Search Results (3:01)
Chilling Effects (2:10)
Criteria for Information Removal (3:24)
Allowing Elite Abilities (3:32)
Q&A: Right Infringements (1:35)
Q&A: Google's Power (2:05)
Q&A: Law Tailored to Google (2:40)
Q&A: Administrative Criteria (3:03)
Q&A: 4th Amendment Context (1:45)
Q&A: Validity of Anonymity (1:34)
Q&A: Law Application (2:16)
Q&A: Oklahoma University Students' Racist Remarks (4:17)
Q&A: Adjudicating Power (3:42)
Concluding Statements For: Paul Nemitz (2:10)
Concluding Statements Against: Andrew McLaughlin (2:19)
Concluding Statements For: Eric Posner (2:02)
Concluding Statements Against: Jonathan Zittrain (2:15)
Debate Wrap Up (3:07)
Audience Voting Results (0:50)
Credits: The U.S. Should Adopt the "Right to Be Forgotten" Online: A Debate (0:58)
Trying Out Segment Feature (4:22)
Videorecording number
94776 Infobase
Genre/Form
Educational films.
Internet videos.
Also listed under
Infobase, film distributor.
Intelligence2, production company.
Bookmark As
Citation
