Books+ Search Results

Imaginary Philosophical Dialogues between Sages down the Ages

Title
Imaginary Philosophical Dialogues [electronic resource] : between Sages down the Ages / by Kenneth Binmore.
ISBN
9783030653873
Edition
1st ed. 2021.
Publication
Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, 2021.
Physical Description
1 online resource (XII, 209 p.)
Local Notes
Access is available to the Yale community.
Access and use
Access restricted by licensing agreement.
Summary
How would Plato have responded if his student Aristotle had ever challenged his idea that our senses perceive nothing more than the shadows cast upon a wall by a true world of perfect ideals? What would Charles Darwin have said to Karl Marx about his claim that dialectical materialism is a scientific theory of evolution? How would Jean-Paul Sartre have reacted to Simone de Beauvoir's claim that the Marquis de Sade was a philosopher worthy of serious attention? This light-hearted book proposes answers to such questions by imagining dialogues between thirty-three pairs of philosophical sages who were alive at the same time. Sometime famous sages get a much rougher handling than usual, as when Adam Smith beards Immanuel Kant in his Konigsberg den. Sometimes neglected or maligned sages get a chance to say what they really believed, as when Epicurus explains that he wasn't epicurean. Sometimes the dialogues are about the origins of modern concepts, as when Blaise Pascal and Pierre de Fermat discuss their invention of probability, or when John Nash and John von Neumann discuss the creation of game theory. Even in these scientific cases, the intention is that the protagonists come across as fallible human beings like the rest of us, rather than the intellectual paragons of philosophical textbooks. .
Variant and related titles
Springer ENIN.
Other formats
Printed edition:
Printed edition:
Format
Books / Online
Language
English
Added to Catalog
January 21, 2021
Contents
Protagoras versus Socrates
Diogenes versus Plato
Aristotle versus Plato
Eudoxus versus Aristotle
Epicurus versus Zeno
Sextus Empiricus versus Marcus Aurelius
Augustine versus Hypatia
Anselm versus Abelard
Thomas Aquinas versus Roger Bacon
William of Ockham versus Duns Scotus
Thomas Hobbes versus Ren e Descartes
Blaise Pascal versus Pierre de Fermat
John Locke versus Thomas Hobbes
Gottfried Leibniz versus Baruch de Spinoza
David Hume versus Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Immanuel Kant versus Adam Smith
Edmund Burke versus Thomas Paine
Jeremy Bentham versus John Stuart Mill
Friedrich Engels versus Karl Marx
Charles Darwin versus Gregor Mendel
Karl Marx versus Charles Darwin
Georg Cantor versus Bertrand Russell
Bertrand Russell versus John Dewey
Ludwig Wittgenstein versus David Hilbert
Oskar Morgenstern versus John von Neumann
Karl Popper versus Ludwig Wittgenstein
Jean-Paul Sartre versus Simone de Beauvoir
John Nash versus John von Neumann
Rudolph Carnap versus Leonard Savage
Imre Lakatos versus Karl Popper
Robert Nozick versus David Lewis
John Rawls versus John Harsanyi
Derek Parfit versus John Rawls.
Also listed under
SpringerLink (Online service)
Citation

Available from:

Online
Loading holdings.
Unable to load. Retry?
Loading holdings...
Unable to load. Retry?