Books+ Search Results

Bibliometrics and research evaluation : uses and abuses

Uniform Title
Dérives de l'évaluation de la recherche. English
Title
Bibliometrics and research evaluation : uses and abuses / Yves Gingras.
ISBN
9780262337649
0262337649
9780262337663
0262337665
0262337657
9780262337656
9780262035125
Publication
Cambridge, Massachusetts : The MIT Press, [2016]
Copyright Notice Date
©2016
Physical Description
1 online resource (xii, 119 pages).
Local Notes
Access is available to the Yale community.
Notes
OCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record.
Access and use
Access restricted by licensing agreement.
Summary
"The research evaluation market is booming. "Ranking," "metrics," "h-index," and "impact factors" are reigning buzzwords. Government and research administrators want to evaluate everything -- teachers, professors, training programs, universities -- using quantitative indicators. Among the tools used to measure "research excellence," bibliometrics -- aggregate data on publications and citations -- has become dominant. Bibliometrics is hailed as an "objective" measure of research quality, a quantitative measure more useful than "subjective" and intuitive evaluation methods such as peer review that have been used since scientific papers were first published in the seventeenth century. In this book, Yves Gingras offers a spirited argument against an unquestioning reliance on bibliometrics as an indicator of research quality. Gingras shows that bibliometric rankings have no real scientific validity, rarely measuring what they pretend to. Although the study of publication and citation patterns, at the proper scales, can yield insights on the global dynamics of science over time, ill-defined quantitative indicators often generate perverse and unintended effects on the direction of research. Moreover, abuse of bibliometrics occurs when data is manipulated to boost rankings. Gingras looks at the politics of evaluation and argues that using numbers can be a way to control scientists and diminish their autonomy in the evaluation process. Proposing precise criteria for establishing the validity of indicators at a given scale of analysis, Gingras questions why universities are so eager to let invalid indicators influence their research strategy."
Variant and related titles
MIT Press complete backfile monographs D2O.
Format
Books / Online
Language
English
Added to Catalog
February 07, 2022
Series
History and foundations of information science
Citation

Available from:

Online
Loading holdings.
Unable to load. Retry?
Loading holdings...
Unable to load. Retry?