Librarian View

LEADER 03841cam a2200337 4500
001 8850977
005 20221207233422.0
008 731206s1973 dcua b 001 0 eng
010
  
  
|a 73602601
035
  
  
|a (OCoLC)ocn682778123
035
  
  
|a 8850977
040
  
  
|a DLC |c DLC |d MUQ |d P#O |d EAU |d CLU
019
  
  
|a 791329 |a 1934039 |a 6327816
043
  
  
|a n-us---
050
0
4
|a KF9223 |b .A846
079
  
  
|a ocm00742154
088
  
  
|a NCJ 10859
110
1
  
|a United States. |b National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals.
245
1
0
|a Courts.
260
  
  
|a [Washington; |b For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off., |c 1973]
300
  
  
|a xxi, 358 p. |b illus. |c 26 cm.
490
1
  
|a Its Report
504
  
  
|a Bibliography: p. 323-337.
505
0
  
|a Foreword / Russell W. Peterson -- Preface / Daniel J. Meador -- Masthead -- Part I. Introduction -- Part II. The flow of the criminal case. Chapter 1. Screening -- Chapter 2. Diversion -- Chapter 3. The negotiated plea -- Chapter 4. The litigated case -- Chapter 5. Sentencing -- Chapter 6. Review of the trial court proceedings -- Part III. Personnel and institutions. Chapter 7. The judiciary -- Chapter 8. The lower courts -- Chapter 9. Court administration -- Chapter 10. Court-community relations -- Chapter 11. Computers and the courts -- Chapter 12. The prosecution -- Chapter 13. The defense -- Part IV. Special problem areas. Chapter 14. Juveniles -- Chapter 15. Mass disorders -- Dissenting views -- Bibliography -- Commission members -- Task force members -- Advisory task force members -- Index -- Photo credits.
520
  
  
|a This report presents proposals for the restructuring and streamlining of the processing of criminal cases at state and local levels. A major restructuring and streamlining of procedures and practices in processing criminal cases at state and local levels is proposed by the National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals. The proposals of the Commission appear in the form of specific standards and recommendations -- almost 100 in all -- that spell out in detail where, why, how, and what improvements can and should be made in the judicial segment of the criminal justice system. The report on courts is a reference work for the practitioner -- judge, court administrator, prosecutor, or defender -- as well as the interested layman. The Commission argues that the problems which keep the criminal court system from performing its functions are inconsistency in the processing of criminal defendants, uncertainty concerning results obtained, unacceptable delays, and alienation of the community. In composing suggested improvements for the court system, the Commission's first priority is to devise standards for attaining speed and efficiency in the pretrial and trial processes and prompt finality in appellate proceedings. The second priority is the upgrading of defense and prosecution functions and the third priority is the assurance of a high quality in the judiciary. To expedite pretrial procedures the prosecutor should screen all criminal cases coming before him and divert from the system all cases wherein further processing by the prosecutor is not appropriate. Among Commission recommendations are: elimination of all but the investigative function of the grand jury; elimination of formal arraignment; unification of all courts within each state; and the upgrading of criminal court personnel.
650
  
0
|a Criminal justice, Administration of |z United States.
650
  
6
|a Justice pénale |x Administration |z États-Unis.
810
1
  
|a United States. |b National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals. |t Report.
901
  
  
|a KF9223
902
  
  
|a Government Documents |b Library Shelving Facility (LSF) >> Y3.C86:2C83|DELIM|9256609
907
  
  
|a 2009-06-16T09:31:01.000Z