Librarian View
LEADER
04303nam a22005535i 4500
001
16068640
005
20211130141020.0
006
m o d
007
cr nn 008mamaa
008
211123s2021 si | o |||| 0|eng d
020
|a
9789811650147
024
7
|a
10.1007/978-981-16-5014-7
|2
doi
035
|a
(DE-He213)978-981-16-5014-7
050
4
|a
K3236-3268.5
100
1
|a
Block, Walter E.
|e
author.
|4
aut
|4
http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245
1
0
|a
Evicitionism
|h
[electronic resource] :
|b
The compromise solution to the pro-life pro-choice debate controversy /
|c
by Walter E. Block.
250
|a
1st ed. 2021.
264
1
|a
Singapore :
|b
Springer Singapore :
|b
Imprint: Springer,
|c
2021.
300
|a
1 online resource (VIII, 172 p.) 1 illus.
336
|a
text
|b
txt
|2
rdacontent
337
|a
computer
|b
c
|2
rdamedia
338
|a
online resource
|b
cr
|2
rdacarrier
347
|a
text file
|b
PDF
|2
rda
505
0
|a
Part I: Introduction -- Chapter 1. Introduction -- Part II: What is evictionism? The background -- Chapter 2. What is evictionism? -- Part III: Response to libertarian critiques of evictionism -- Chapter 3. Responses to three leading libertarians: Rothbard, Paul and Rand -- Chapter 4. Rejoinder to Doris Gordon on abortion -- Chapter 5. Response to Friedman on Narveson on abortion -- Chapter 6. Comment on Narveson on Friedman on abortion -- Part IV: Response to non-libertarian critiques of evictionism -- Chapter 7. Rejoinder to Boonin on abortion -- Chapter 8. A Response to Beckwith's book review of Boonin -- Chapter 9. Deadlocked; a reaction to McDonagh and Ford on abortion -- Chapter 10. Response to Lee's "A Christian Philosopher's View of Recent Directions in the Abortion Debate." -- Chapter 11. Marquis on abortion -- Chapter 12. Tooley on abortion: a rejoinder.
506
|a
Access restricted by licensing agreement.
520
|a
This book applies libertarian property rights theory to a vexing controversy, abortion. This book offers a compromise solution that will not fully please either of the two sides of this debate, but, is the only possible reconciliation between the two. Nor are its benefits limited to the fact that the opposing forces in this debate may be brought together. Evictionism, also, is the only philosophical position compatible with human rights; neither of the other two can make this claim. There are many other publications and learned articles supporting the pro-life position as well as defending the pro-life viewpoint. This is the only book that offers a perspective on abortion that is radically different than both. This book uniquely applies private property rights theories we all agree upon when referred to issues such as real estate, crime, torts, etc., to abortion. The underlying philosophical contribution of Evictionism this book presents is that these basic legal premises can be utilized in this controversial case as well as practically everywhere else in law. Want to solve the abortion controversy? Want to demonstrate that both the pro-life and the pro-choice positions are erroneous? Want to read about a position that is a compromise between the pro-life and the pro-choice positions? Then this book provides robust understanding, discussions and applications for getting to the truth about this issue. .
590
|a
Access is available to the Yale community.
650
0
|a
Human rights.
650
0
|a
Criminal law.
650
0
|a
Private international law.
650
0
|a
Conflict of laws.
650
0
|a
Public law .
650
0
|a
History.
650
0
|a
Ethics.
710
2
|a
SpringerLink (Online service)
730
0
|a
Springer ENIN.
773
0
|t
Springer Nature eBook
776
0
8
|i
Printed edition:
|z
9789811650130
776
0
8
|i
Printed edition:
|z
9789811650154
776
0
8
|i
Printed edition:
|z
9789811650161
852
8
0
|b
yulint
|h
None
|z
Online resource
852
8
0
|z
Online resource
856
4
0
|y
Online book
|u
https://yale.idm.oclc.org/login?URL=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5014-7
901
|a
K3236-3268.5
902
|a
Yale Internet Resource
|b
Yale Internet Resource >> None|DELIM|16006749
905
|a
online resource
907
|a
2021-11-30T14:10:20.000Z
946
|a
DO NOT EDIT. DO NOT EXPORT.
953
|a
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5014-7