Librarian View

LEADER 03950nam a2200577Ii 4500
001 16536191
005 20230127140814.0
006 m o d
007 cr una||||||||
008 210614t20212021miua ob 001 0 eng d
035
  
  
|a (MiU)10.3998/mpub.11927173
040
  
  
|a EYM |b eng |e rda |e pn |c EYM
020
  
  
|a 9780472129324 |q e-book
020
  
  
|a 0472129325 |q e-book
020
  
  
|z 9780472132706 |q hardcover book
020
  
  
|z 9780472038640 |q paperback book
024
7
  
|a 10.3998/mpub.11927173 |2 doi
043
  
  
|a n-us---
050
  
4
|a HQ76.8.U5
100
1
  
|a Bishin, Benjamin G., |d 1967- |e author.
245
1
0
|a Elite-led mobilization and gay rights : |b dispelling the myth of mass opinion backlash / |c Benjamin G. Bishin, Thomas J. Hayes, Matthew B. Incantalupo, and Charles Anthony Smith.
264
  
1
|a Ann Arbor, Michigan : |b University of Michigan Press, |c 2021.
264
  
4
|c ©2021
300
  
  
|a 1 online resource (xviii, 256 pages) : |b illustrations
336
  
  
|a text |b txt |2 rdacontent
337
  
  
|a computer |b c |2 rdamedia
338
  
  
|a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier
504
  
  
|a Includes bibliographical references (pages 233-256) and index.
506
  
  
|a Access restricted by licensing agreement.
520
3
  
|a Media and scholastic accounts describe a strong public opinion backlash--a sharply negative and enduring opinion change--against attempts to advance gay rights. Academic research, however, increasingly questions backlash as an explanation for opposition to LGBT rights. The authors of Elite-led Mobilization and Gay Rights argue that what appears to be public opinion backlash against gay rights is more consistent with elite-led mobilization--a strategy used by anti-gay elites, primarily white evangelicals, seeking to prevent the full incorporation of LGBT Americans in the polity in order to achieve political objectives and increase their political power. This book defines and tests the theory of Mass Opinion Backlash and develops and tests the theory of Elite-Led Mobilization by employing a series of online and natural experiments, surrounding the Supreme Court rulings in Obergefell and Windsor, and President Obama's position change on gay marriage. The authors employ extensive survey, voting behavior, and campaign finance data, and examine the history of the LGBT movement and its opposition by religious conservatives, from the Lavender Scare, to the campaign against Trans Rights in the defeat of Houston's 2015 HERO ordinance, to evaluate these theories. Finally, this book examines what is widely considered the textbook case of anti-gay backlash: the 2010 Iowa Judicial Retention Election. Taken together, the evidence shows that opposition to LGBT rights is a top down process incited by anti-gay elites rather than a bottom up process described by public opinion backlash.
588
  
  
|a Description based on information from the publisher.
590
  
  
|a Access is available to the Yale community.
650
  
0
|a Gay rights |z United States |x Public opinion.
650
  
0
|a Gays |z United States |x Public opinion.
650
  
0
|a Gay rights |z United States |x Religious aspects.
650
  
0
|a Gays |z United States |x Religious aspects.
650
  
0
|a Elite (Social sciences) |z United States |x Attitudes.
700
1
  
|a Hayes, Thomas J., |e author.
700
1
  
|a Incantalupo, Matthew B., |e author.
700
1
  
|a Smith, Charles Anthony, |e author.
710
2
  
|a Michigan Publishing (University of Michigan), |e publisher.
730
0
  
|a UMPEBC 2021.
852
8
0
|b yulintx |h None |z Online resource
852
8
0
|z Online resource
856
4
0
|y Online book |u https://yale.idm.oclc.org/login?URL=https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11927173
901
  
  
|a HQ76.8.U5
902
  
  
|a Yale Internet Resource |b Yale Internet Resource >> None|DELIM|16444914
905
  
  
|a online resource
907
  
  
|a 2023-01-27T14:08:14.000Z
946
  
  
|a DO NOT EDIT. DO NOT EXPORT.
953
  
  
|a https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11927173